{"id":788,"date":"2009-08-19T12:37:59","date_gmt":"2009-08-19T17:37:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gracefulspoon.com\/blog\/?p=788"},"modified":"2011-05-13T09:16:17","modified_gmt":"2011-05-13T14:16:17","slug":"something-there-is-that-doesnt-love-a-wall","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/gracefulspoon.com\/blog\/2009\/08\/19\/something-there-is-that-doesnt-love-a-wall\/","title":{"rendered":"something there is that doesn’t love a wall"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a> Two neighbors are meeting at the terminus of their properties and inspecting a damaged rock wall that divides their lots in Robert Frost\u2019s \u201cMending Wall<\/a>.\u201d The narrator is playful, almost goading and pushing the neighbor into articulating the necessity of rebuilding the wall. These are the last five lines of the poem: <\/p>\n He moves in darkness as it seems to me~ That second guy, the one moving in darkness, the recalcitrant and plodding neighbor, a blind slave to the cliches of the father, that guy is Michael Chertoff<\/a>. As reported in the Washington Post of August 2007<\/a>, El Paso Mayor John Cook stated: \u201cMost people in Washington really don’t understand life on the border \u2026They don’t understand our philosophy here that the border joins us together, it doesn’t separate us.\u201d<\/p>\n The context of Cook\u2019s statement was a lawsuit filed by the City of El Paso, El Paso County, the El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1, and the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, among others, against the Department of Homeland Security. In 2005, Congress tasked DHS with the \u201cthe expeditious construction of barriers\u201d to construct the border wall and granted Chertoff power to void any federal law that would prevent that expeditious construction. Thirty-six laws protecting environmental quality, historical resources and native American sites were waived. El Paso believed the waivers were detrimental to the health of the region and found them unconstitutional. In September 2008 a Federal District Judge granted the DHS\u2019s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. El Paso lost, and the fence was quickly rushed to completion before a January 31, 2009 deadline. With the damage already done, in June of 2009 the US Supreme Court denied the city and county\u2019s appeal<\/a>. The court upheld that Congress had legitimately granted Chertoff the power to dismiss any law<\/a> that could potentially deny his given mandate.<\/p>\n Except in matters of national security, Mexico City and Washington, D.C., are remote and disengaged from the workings of the border. Today it is largely up to the local governments and organizations along the border region to resolve persistent local urban problems in the area, such as zoning and water rights. The border region has frequently been defined as a \u201cthird space,\u201d with competing government agencies, and NGO\u2019s occupying this new territory. However, the lawsuit showed that no matter how far removed, the Federal Government can still trump local concerns. <\/p>\n Even in an administration bursting with hubris, when defending the border wall Chertoff stands out as a fount with a number of choice quotes. Among them being, in defending security at the border from El Paso concerns: Chertoff claimed the city “had no idea how difficult it is here at the border.” And considering the detrimental repercussions a steel border would have for economic and cultural future of the conjoined twin cities of El Paso and Juarez, Chertoff stated that in response to DHS actions that, “We don’t want to destroy the border in order to save it.” (Even hearing a government official obliquely reference B\u1ebfn Tre logic<\/a> in a domestic setting is both ridiculous and pretty frightening.)
\n<\/a>
\nIt\u2019s eighteen feet tall. The vertical steel pylons are set closer together than the width of a truck to resist the force of direct a hit, thereby avoiding the possibility of any punctures or vents. The pylons are infilled with an anodized metal mesh, a mesh that flaunts heartbreakingly clear views through to the other side, which, however, is at the same time dense enough to prevent all but the smallest of fingers and toes from finding purchase. A man wielding bolt cutters was shot here by a Border Patrol agent eighteen months ago. (boilerplate response<\/a>: \u201cthe Mexican government opposes the use of lethal weapons in situations that do not represent a proportionate risk.\u201d) The concrete base is over three feet wide to withstand a potential rocket attack and extends six feet into the underground bedrock layer to deter any would-be tunneling. It cuts through the desert for 690 miles, heedless and ignorant of laws designed to protect and uphold environmental protection, endangered species reserves, migratory bird paths, antiquities, Native American graves and religious freedoms, among thirty others. To the U.S. Government it is not a wall, it is \u201ctactical infrastructure<\/a>.\u201d And no one wanted it here.<\/p>\n
\nNot of woods only and the shade of trees.
\nHe will not go behind his father’s saying,
\nAnd he likes having thought of it so well
\nHe says again, “Good fences make good neighbors.” <\/p>\n
\nBut in the end, Chertoff is no different than the neighbor in Frost’s poem, unable to comprehend the inane necessity, but nevertheless pushing forward with all expeditious concerns, all the while ignoring the difficulty of justifying its existence does not preclude actual construction. As an essential infrastructural component, the wall was rushed to completion and now stands as a thin monument to fear and paranoia.<\/p>\n